Unemployment: A Product of the Education System

unemployment-product-of-education-system
Jul 27, 2025
visibility 58 Read
The original purpose of English education was to create a clerical workforce necessary to run colonial administration. It hardly needs explaining what a blunder it is to try to turn an entire nation into clerks.
Yet, even after the British left, we have continued with that same education system, producing an overwhelming number of clerks—which has led to a massive unemployment crisis in our country (and similar countries). We are drowning in that crisis.
 
Even before we can create new jobs, hundreds of thousands of new clerks are graduating and entering the workforce. The nation is struggling under the weight of these educated unemployed individuals. Uneducated people are rarely unemployed, as they do not hesitate to engage in physical labor.
But when someone collects one or two certificates, they can no longer be employed in manual labor. Their surroundings and mindset become a towering wall, higher than the Himalayas, that blocks their path.
 
One of the primary goals of education is the development and advancement of human resources. But the education system we currently have does not meet the needs of the times—much less the needs of the intellect. Instead of being a vehicle for progress, the existing system has become a burden to society.
No matter how much we glorify our education, we have not made significant progress. The colonial education system that once at least served the British has lost even that minimal relevance in independent Bangladesh. This is not just unfortunate—it is shameful.
 
According to the 2023 Quarterly Labour Force Survey by the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, the total labor force in the first quarter of 2024 was 73.7 million. By the end of that quarter, the number of unemployed had risen to 2.59 million, up from 2.35 million in the previous quarter (October–December 2023). That’s an increase of 240,000 unemployed in just three months (Bangla Tribune, May 6, 2024).
 
This trend of rising unemployment continues in Bangladesh. What is most alarming is the situation of the highly educated. The 2022 full report by the Bureau of Statistics states that 12% of university graduates are unemployed. By 2023, the number of unemployed graduates had doubled in five years, reaching 800,000. A pre-COVID ILO report showed that among 28 Asia-Pacific countries, Bangladesh had the second-highest rate of educated unemployment—just behind Pakistan.
 
According to the Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies (BIDS), the overall unemployment rate is 3.6%, while youth unemployment accounts for nearly 80% of that. As a result, for every job opening, applicants with higher qualifications than required often apply. For example, between December and March 2024, Bangladesh Railway hired 2,172 waymen in two phases—a fourth-grade job involving physically demanding tasks such as track maintenance. The required qualification was SSC or equivalent, yet most of those hired had Master’s degrees.
 
Moreover, due to a lack of moral education, many Bangladeshis have lost or are losing job opportunities in the Middle East (Bangladesh Economic Association). A report by The Economist Intelligence Unit (London-based) states that Bangladesh has the highest rate of graduate unemployment in South Asia—47%. That means 47 out of every 100 university graduates are unemployed.
 
Everyone would agree: the unemployment of an educated person cannot be equated with that of an uneducated one. The investment made by the state, family, and society is wasted if it produces no return.
 
According to newspapers, 2.2 million people enter the labor market every year. But only 700,000 find jobs. The remaining 1.5 million become a burden on the nation. It is important that every citizen is educated—but more important is the proper utilization of that educated population.
If we cannot provide employment to the millions entering the workforce each year, not only does social unrest increase, but crime rates also spiral out of control.
 
According to a July 1, 2012 report in Amar Desh, Mohammad Ibrahim, a researcher from the Bangladesh Economic Association, stated that due to our flawed education system, the number of educated unemployed is rising every day.
The outdated system produces clerks, not skilled manpower. Another researcher, Mohammad Abdullahil Baki Billah, observed that as education rates increase, so does unemployment. The higher pass rates have only increased joblessness.
 
The research identifies the main cause of educated unemployment as the existing general education system. Every year, 400,000 students pass the postgraduate exams, most of whom hope for a job and remain unemployed for 6–7 years.
They fail to develop specialized skills and often end up working abroad under people who have only passed high school. After finishing their general education, they are given no guidance about what kind of jobs they might be fit for. The lack of job counseling in institutions means students are unaware of their actual capabilities.
 
This educated middle class has been a headache for the nation since British rule. In the 19th century, the introduction of English education created this class. Describing the mindset of this group, Promothnath Bishi wrote in 1948:
"A middle class quickly formed in Bengal. This class was both the achievement and the curse of British rule—its rise and its downfall. The British ruled with the help of this clerk-based middle class, but eventually, this very class, disillusioned with colonialism, pulled the first brick from the imperial throne. Most Bengali revolutionaries were from this middle class."
Now, the situation has changed. The middle class has lost its respect and influence. With the expansion of industrial machinery, their relevance is dwindling. This middle class remains a special problem in Bengal—millions of educated, capable, yet now helpless and frustrated individuals.
 
They once helped establish colonial rule, illuminated Bengali culture, and rebelled against imperialism. Now they are exhausted and almost incapable of earning a living—like demobilized soldiers, wandering helplessly. Authorities see them as unwanted, the masses see them as excess, and they see themselves as cursed. If a proper solution for this middle class is not found, they will not allow peace in society, and their unrest may once again shake the foundations of governance.
Promothnath Bishi continued:
"Today’s predicament has its roots in the schools of Hare and the classrooms of Hindu College. Back then, knowing English meant guaranteed employment. A British officer would personally call for you. Someone would say ‘Let me ask my mother,’ another would say ‘I’ll do it if it’s like my father’s job,’ and some would say their mothers won’t let them go to a land beyond the Ganges.
 
Then, the employers chased the job-seekers. Today, even if one swallows the English Channel, not even a security guard will look your way. The solution of that era has become the crisis of today."
The term “kerani” (clerk) symbolizes mediocrity, subservience, and lack of creativity. In the British era, without photocopiers, clerks used to copy documents by hand—thus the English term “writer” became associated with them. The secretariat in Kolkata is still called the Writers’ Building. There’s an old story about a clerk who was copying a document when he came across a dead fly stuck to a word, making it illegible.
 
He spent three days trying to kill a similar fly, and finally pasted it in the same spot to make a perfect copy—hence the Bengali proverb “machhi mara kerani” (the fly-killing clerk), meaning someone doing useless work. This was cited in an article by Krishanu Bhattacharya.
Even surveys were done on clerks during the British era! The famous civil servant, journalist, writer, and British advisor William Hunter conducted such a study. In 1870, Bengal had 10,247 clerks, which grew to 16,315 by 1881, and to 18,950 after another decade. This ever-growing number likely gave rise to the stereotype of the "clerk mentality" among Bengalis.
 
In 1886, Hunter became Vice Chancellor of Calcutta University and president of the Education Commission. His most famous book “The Indian Musalmans” was dedicated to Mr. Hudson, who once gifted 29 severed heads of children from the Mughal palace to the old emperor Bahadur Shah Zafar.
Let’s return to the main point. The term kerani to us symbolizes petty insignificance. A kerani means subordinate, dependent, unthinking. He has no right to opinions or awareness. He merely obeys. Maulana Abdul Hamid Khan Bhashani used to call the American ambassador “America’s kerani” and refused to sit in talks with him.
 
He once said: “What’s there to discuss with a kerani?” When invited to a meeting, he declined, saying clerks of foreign powers have no say in the matters of a sovereign nation—a bold declaration from a patriotic, free-spirited leader.
But today’s national leaders have become so spineless that they endlessly flatter British and American ambassadors. Before elections, political leaders present their blueprints for governance not to the people, but first to these foreign ambassadors (Manabzamin, 13/08/13), because they believe their fate lies in the hands of Western diplomats.

Images Related to this Post

Leave a Comment